People v. Englert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judg*988ment convicting him after a jury trial of two counts of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [2]), defendant contends that County Court’s Sandoval ruling constituted an abuse of discretion (see, People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371). By failing “to raise any objection to the court’s ultimate ruling,” defendant has failed to preserve that contention for our review (People v McAllister, 245 AD2d 184, lv denied 91 NY2d 894; see, People v Sides, 265 AD2d 907, 908). In any event, that contention lacks merit. The court…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. AbrewNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- People v. WatsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. ArguinzoniAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. PonderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. HawkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. LawsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.