Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ideal Farms, Inc. And Franklin Lakes Dairy Producers, Inc. v. Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 23, 1961No. 13263_1Published

1DissentHastie, Circuit Judge

The marketing order in controversy was issued under the authority conferred upon the Secretary of Agriculture by section 8c(5) of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended. 7 U.S.C.A. § 608c(5). If authority for its provisions cannot be found there, then it is conceded that the order is illegal.1 That subsection begins by specifying that an order issued under its sanction shall contain only those “terms and conditions” which are specified in the detail of its text. The provision thought to be relevant here appears in subsection 8c(5) (A) and authorizes the fixing of certain…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. United States v. Heirs of BoisdoréSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  3. National Labor Relations Board v. Lion Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API