Legal Opinion
United States v. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 20, 1961No. Nos. 13289-13291PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.
The prime issue presented by these appeals is whether certain provisions of New York-New Jersey Milk Marketing Order, 7 C.F.R. § 927.1 et seq., (hereinafter referred to as Order No. 27), requiring all non-pool handlers of milk, to make a “compensatory payment” to the Producers Settlement Fund for all non-pool fluid milk distributed by them in the marketing area, 7 C.F.R. §§ 927.83, 927.84, contravenes the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, as amended by the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.
Docket No. 13,289, is an enforcement…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Rock Royal Co-Operative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Stark v. WickardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bailey Farm Dairy Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
- Queensboro Farms Products v. WickardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- PPG Indus., Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
- United States v. Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc., and Suncrest Farms, Inc., Lehigh Valley Cooperative Farmers, Inc. v. Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of America, Suncrest Farms, Inc. v. Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Ideal Farms, Inc. And Franklin Lakes Dairy Producers, Inc. v. Ezra Taft Benson, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961