National Labor Relations Board v. Lion Oil Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Warren
In this case we are called upon again to interpret § 8 (d) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended.1 *284See Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board, 350 U. S. 270. In particular we are concerned with §8 (d)(4), which provides that a party who wishes to modify or terminate *285a collective bargaining contract must continue “in full force and effect, without resorting to strike or lockout, all the terms and conditions of the existing contract for a period of sixty days after . . . notice [of his wish to modify or terminate] is given or until the expiration date of such contract, whichever occurs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Heirs of BoisdoréSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sands Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Local No. 3, United Packing House Workers of America, CIO v. National Labor Relations Board Wilson & Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Lion Oil Company v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
3Cited by220 opinions
- In Re Pacor, Inc. v. John Higgins, Jr. And Louise HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Bureau of Investigation v. AbramsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
215 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.