Legal Opinion

Bothenberg v. Bothenberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1958Published

1Opinion of the CourtHenry Epstein, J.

There are two motions before the court: (1) to open judgment of annulment on default of defendant; and (2) to grant plaintiff’s attorney a counsel fee for defending against this application to vacate the default judgment. Both motions are denied in the exercise of the court’s discretion. After a judgment annulling the marriage has been entered it is questionable whether this court can award counsel fee to defend the severance of marital ties in the form of annulment (Laner v. Laner, 165 Misc. 576; Spielberger v. Spielberger, 122 N. Y. S. 2d 858, 860). The court does not find the cases cited…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. D'Auria v. D'AuriaNew York Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Laner v. LanerNew York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API