Legal Opinion
Persinger v. Marathon Petroleum Co.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided November 18, 1988No. IP 83-1915CPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
McKINNEY, District Judge.
This cause comes before the Court on the second motion for summary judgment of Marathon Petroleum Company, the plaintiff’s response in opposition to summary judgment, and Marathon’s reply thereto. Neither party has requested oral argument, and the Court, in accordance with Local Rule 11, does not find it either necessary or worthwhile in this instance. After considering the briefs and the record developed in this case, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court now GRANTS the defendant’s second motion for…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Boos v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Spangler v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1990
- Charles J. Bafia v. Northern Indiana Public Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993