Legal Opinion
Spangler v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided December 11, 1990No. IP 87-1013-CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TINDER, District Judge.
After a riding lawn mower accident in which Mr. Burl Spangler allegedly suffered extensive injury to his right foot, Mr. Span-gler and his wife Bonnie brought a six-' count complaint against Sears, Roebuck and Co. and Roper Corporation (hereinafter collectively described as “Sears”) the alleged manufacturer and seller of the riding mower. Mr. and Mrs. Spangler seek to recover under theories of products liability (Count I), products liability—loss of consortium (Count II), negligence (Count III), negligence—loss of consortium (Count IV), fraudulent concealment (Count V)…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. ArmstrongIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Bud Wolf Chevrolet, Inc. v. RobertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Amcast Industrial Corp. v. Detrex Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
- Atkinson v. P & G-Clairol, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- Spangler v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991
- Kevin Phillips v. Cameron Tool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Spangler v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.