Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mehales

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 27, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C.J.

An indictment was presented charging that the defendant on September 20, 1932, at Orange, “did willfully and maliciously attempt to set fire to” a hotel building belonging to third persons. The case was tried before a judge of the Superior Court sitting without a jury upon an agreed statement of facts. Those facts show that the defendant made a bargain through the procurement of an owner of an unoccupied building to burn it for compensation for the purpose of enabling the owners to collect insurance. Pursuant to that arrangement the defendant, when it was somewhat dark and after seven o’clock…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PeasleeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Commonwealth v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Commonwealth v. MakelyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BloombergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Commonwealth v. LamotheMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
  3. Commonwealth v. ShumanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. AnolikMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API