State v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of fourth-degree arson, A.R.S. Sec. 13-234, and was placed on probation for a period of two years. He contends that the trial court erred in granting the state’s motion in limine, refusing certain instructions and admitting into evidence a spontaneous statement uttered by him on the way to the police station.
Resolution of the questions presented for review depends upon the answers to two questions. (1) Is fourth-degree arson a specific intent crime? (2) Is a spontaneous statement by a person too intoxicated to waive his Miranda rights…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. LandrumArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. JamisonArizona Supreme Court · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. MayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- State of Arizona v. Jeffrey Allen BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.