Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 20, 1979No. 2 CA-CR 1753PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of fourth-degree arson, A.R.S. Sec. 13-234, and was placed on probation for a period of two years. He contends that the trial court erred in granting the state’s motion in limine, refusing certain instructions and admitting into evidence a spontaneous statement uttered by him on the way to the police station.

Resolution of the questions presented for review depends upon the answers to two questions. (1) Is fourth-degree arson a specific intent crime? (2) Is a spontaneous statement by a person too intoxicated to waive his Miranda rights…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. LandrumArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  4. State v. ClarkArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. JamisonArizona Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  2. State v. MayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. State of Arizona v. Jeffrey Allen BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API