Legal Opinion

Plyler v. Moss & Moore, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1979No. 7819SC347PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Judge.

The defendant assigns as error the trial court’s denial of its motion for a directed verdict in its favor as to the plaintiffs’ claim for relief based upon allegations of negligence. A motion for a directed verdict raises the issue of whether the evidence supporting the nonmoving party’s claim for relief is sufficient to require that the claim be submitted to the jury. Byerly v. Byerly, 38 N.C. App. 551, 248 S.E. 2d 433 (1978). In determining whether the evidence is sufficient in such situations, the court must consider it in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daughtry v. TurnageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Firemen's Mutual Insurance v. High Point Sprinkler Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Byerly v. ByerlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Frazier v. Suburban Rulane Gas CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  5. Byerly v. ByerlyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. Crinkley v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  3. Crinkley v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  4. Lindsay v. Public Service Co. of N.C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  5. Pleasant Valley Promenade v. Lechmere, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API