Legal Opinion
Bickram v. Case I.H.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 15, 1989No. 86 CV 1939PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
Defendants Case I.H. (“Case”), BGS Leasing Systems, Inc. (“BGS”), Kustom Equipment Rental, Kustom Auto & Equipment Co., and Kustom Crane Services, Inc. (all referred to as “Kustom”) move this Court, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56, for an order granting summary judgment. Because the amount in controversy exceeds $10,000 and because the plaintiff is a citizen of a foreign nation, Case is a Wisconsin corporation, and BGS and Kustom are New York corporations, the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2).
FACTS
The undisputed facts are as…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Caprara v. Chrysler Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Rutherford Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Assam v. Deer Park Spring Water, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Long v. Tokai Bank of CaliforniaOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Campbell v. BIC Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1992
- Del Cid v. Beloit Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.