Legal Opinion

County of Durham v. Daye

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 3, 2009No. COA07-1532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Plaintiffs, the City of Durham and the County of Durham, appeal from the trial court’s final order requiring the City and County to pay damages and attorneys’ fees to the heirs and devisees of Edgar R. Daye and Ella M. Daye, the defendants in this case. Defendants had filed a motion pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of Civil Procedure, seeking relief from a judgment by default entered for non-payment of city and county taxes. In that motion, defendants also sought monetary relief for violation of their constitutional rights. With respect to the County, since a superior court judge…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Leary v. N.C. Forest Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Ray Adduono, Charles L. Abrahams, (Non-Party) v. World Hockey AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  4. Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  5. Moody v. Able Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brittian Ex Rel. Hildebran v. BrittianCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  2. County of Durham v. DayeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  3. County of Durham v. DayeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API