Legal Opinion

Draughon v. Draughon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 1989No. 8812DC889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

The order setting aside the equitable distribution award has no authorized basis, in our opinion, and must be vacated. Though subsection (6) of Rule 60(b), N.C. Rules of Civil Procedure, gives the trial court broad power to serve the ends of justice by vacating a judgment or order for justifiable reasons, Thomas v. Thomas, 43 N.C. App. 638, 260 S.E. 2d 163 (1979), the record plainly establishes that the order involved was not set aside for such a reason. The order was not set aside because it was deemed to be erroneous, unjust, or unfairly arrived at; it was set aside, as the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Town of Sylva v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Town of Sylva v. GibsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. Highfill v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Mayer v. MayerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Harris v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kimzay Winston-Salem, Inc. v. JesterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Thacker v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Duplin County DSS ex rel. Pulley v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API