Legal Opinion

Cowley v. Bolander

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1929No. 21320PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

It is quite manifest that the instruction given before argument, which was in substance that a verdict must be rendered for the defendants if the jury found that the automobile being towed struck the plaintiff as a result of the act of the person at the steering wheel of that automobile, is incorrect in its statement of the law applicable to the case, in view of the evidence disclosed by the record. A similar instruction was given in the general charge, and the court thereby determined as a matter of law that the defendants had no responsibility whatever for the action of the man at the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tresise v. AshdownOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Hollidge v. DuncanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Losito v. Kruse, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Bush v. Harvey Transfer Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Jacobi v. Claude Nolan, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  4. Kohler v. SheffertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1959
  5. Acrey v. BaumanOhio Supreme Court · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API