Legal Opinion

Mervis v. Duke

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 28, 1938No. [No. 15, October Term, 1938.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.

On July 1st, 1933, Julius G. Mervis, Sidney Duke, and Philip Duke entered into a profit sharing agreement for the operation of a tavern in Baltimore City, under which. Mervis was to furnish $500, in return for which the two Dukes were to manage the business, and pay to him one-third of its profits, without any liability in him for its losses, and to repay the $500 from profits.

The Dukes, appellees here, repaid part of the money advanced, but failed to pay the balance, or account for the profits of the business. Mervis thereupon filed the bill in this case to compel them to repay the balance…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seeley v. DunlopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  2. Baker v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  3. Zalis v. OrmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  4. Johnson & Higgins, Inc. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  5. Turner's v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Malinow v. EberlyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
  2. Shah v. HealthPlus, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Golub v. CohenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Metaxa v. CoutrosCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  5. Presutti v. PresuttiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API