Legal Opinion

Johnson & Higgins, Inc. v. Simpson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 26, 1933No. [No. 33, April Term, 1933.]PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSloan, J.

The plaintiff (appellant) has filed a bill for an accounting against the defendant as administratrix of her divorced husband, and at the same time to enjoin the prosecution of a suit at law of the defendant (appellee here), plaintiff in the case at law, which was the subject of an appeal to this court at the October Term, 1932, 163 Md. 574, 163 A. 832, and to have the controversy settled in equity instead of at law, where it now is. The facts are so fully stated by Judge Offutt in the former appeal that anything which may be said here is bound to be mere repetition, and no more will be said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
  2. Union Passenger Railway Co. v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
  3. Payson v. LamsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Seeley v. DunlopCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  5. Johnson & Higgins, Inc. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nagel v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  2. Phillips v. MoellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  3. Perlmutter v. MinskoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  4. Grandberg v. BernardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945
  5. Coster v. Arrow Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API