Legal Opinion

Caldwell v. Scivally

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1926No. 16223PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, C.

W. E. Caldwell will be referred to herein as plaintiff, and Robert F. Scivally will be referred to as defendant.

Plaintiff in May, 1918, filed his petition in the district court of Murray county against the defendant and others, praying that pla' 'itiff be declared the owner of an undivided one-half interest in and to certain lands, and that his title be quieted therein, and that defendants be enjoined irom asserting any title adverse to plaintiff, and that certain deeds and mortgages be canceled, and the lands partitioned or sold, and also prays judgment for the rents and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sharon v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Flesher v. CallahanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Wade v. Crouch and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  4. Thomas v. MorganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Acton v. CulbertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coats v. RileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  2. Wirick v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Davis v. ManhardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Setterstrom v. PhelanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Warner v. WickizerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API