Ragard v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
Under a pre-trial diversion agreement, the District of Columbia Corporation Counsel agreed that, if the criminal defendant performed specified community service, pending charges against him, a captain in the United States Army (“Army”), would be dismissed. Both sides performed the agreement, and the criminal charges were dismissed. The ultimate question in this appeal is whether that agreement barred the Army from subsequently court martialling the defendant for a different offense arising from the same conduct as the District of Columbia charge. We hold that…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Cienega Gardens v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- David L. Bowling v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- James R. Matias v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Longval v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- United States v. RagardArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- Williams v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Harris v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Westdale Northwest Center, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
- Westdale Northwest Center, Lp v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021