Legal Opinion

United States v. Ragard

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided March 29, 2002No. ARMY 9801508PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CHAPMAN, Judge:

A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted the appellant, in accordance with his pleas, of sodomy, in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 925 [hereinafter UCMJ].1 The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a dismissal, forfeiture of $1000.00 pay per month for five months, and a reprimand.2 This case is before this court for review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866.

The appellant asserts in his first assignment of error that the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment3…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Private E2 JARROD E. MCCLAINArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
  2. Ragard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. First Lieutenant RICHARD L. EASTONArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API