United States v. Ragard
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CHAPMAN, Judge:
A military judge, sitting as a general court-martial, convicted the appellant, in accordance with his pleas, of sodomy, in violation of Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 925 [hereinafter UCMJ].1 The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a dismissal, forfeiture of $1000.00 pay per month for five months, and a reprimand.2 This case is before this court for review pursuant to Article 66, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866.
The appellant asserts in his first assignment of error that the double jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment3…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Private E2 JARROD E. MCCLAINArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2008
- Ragard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- United States v. First Lieutenant RICHARD L. EASTONArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011