Legal Opinion

Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Tolson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 2006No. COA05-340PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

When an alternative tax formula or other method more accurately reflects a corporation’s income allocable to North Carolina, the corporation shall allocate its net income for future years in accordance with the Tax Review Board. 1 Here, Philip Morris USA, Incorporated (hereafter “Taxpayer”) appeals from a denial of its request of a tax refund of over $30 million based on its claim of entitlement to the benefits of both a “special tax allocation formula” under two Tax Review Board orders and a subsequently enacted corporate tax incentive formula under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 105-130.4(i)…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Your House of Raleigh, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Shell Island Homeowners Ass'n v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. McLean v. McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. High Rock Lake Ass'n v. North Carolina Environmental Management CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. Charlotte City Coach Lines, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Railroad TrainmenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Vancouver v. Public Employment Relations CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. City Of Vancouver, V State Of Wa Public Employment Relations CommsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  3. In Re RLCSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2007
  4. In re R.L.C.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API