Legal Opinion
Cyrilla Murphy and George H. Murphy v. Harold L. Dyer
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 29, 1969No. 10109_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
In this diversity, malpractice suit arising in Colorado by a patient against her Colorado Springs doctor the defenses were the statute of limitations and non-negligence. The jury returned a general verdict for the defendant under instructions submitting the case on both limitations and negligence. On appeal, the patient, Mrs. Cyrilla Murphy, complains of the court’s instructions on limitations but since no objections were made to them in the trial court and they do not appear to be palpably wrong we accept them as the law of the case. Rule 51 F.R.Civ.P. 28 U.S.C.,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Brune v. BelinkoffMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Douglas v. BussabargerWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Volasco Products Co. v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Vincent Milone v. Moceri Family, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Russell T. Fitzgerald v. Preston C. Manning, Jr., M. D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Moore v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,897 Will L. Clegg v. Leo H. ConkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.