Legal Opinion
C.R. Bard Inc. v. Guidant Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 27, 1998No. CIV. A. 97-305-RRMPublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MCKELVIE, District Judge.
This is a patent case. Plaintiff C.R. Bard, Inc. (“Bard”) is a corporation organized under the laws of New Jersey and has its principal place of business in Murray Hill, New Jersey. Bard is the owner of U.S. Patent No. RE. 33,561 (“the ’561 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. RE. 32,983 (“the ’983 patent”). Both patents claim the invention of a certain type of dilatation balloon catheter. Defendant Guidant Corporation (“Guidant”) is a corporation organized under the laws of Indiana and has its principal place of business in Indianapolis, Indiana. Defendant Advanced…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- George Jumara and Evangelina Jumara, H/w v. State Farm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Max Daetwyler Corp., a New York Corporation v. R. Meyer, a West German Corporation. Appeal of Rolf MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Mobil Oil Corporation v. Linear Films, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
- Ids Life Insurance Company v. Sunamerica Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Medtronic Ave, Inc. v. Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Affymetrix, Inc. v. Synteni, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1998
- Chrysler Corp. v. Chaplake Holdings, Ltd.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2003
- Brown v. General Electric Capital Corp. (In Re Foxmeyer Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2003
- Ethypharm S.A. France v. Bentley Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.