In Re Nissan Motor Corp. Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANTS KINSEL AND SCOTTSDALE
ATKINS, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court upon motion of defendants, Kinsel Datsun, Inc. and Scottsdale Datsun, Inc., to dismiss this action as to them. Plaintiffs have filed memoranda in opposition to the requested dismissal.
The Case
Nissan, Japan and Nissan, U.S.A. and various Datsun dealers (including Kinsel and Scottsdale) are charged in this civil anti-trust suit with engaging in a nationwide combination and conspiracy, in violation of § 1 of the Sherman Act, to fix, maintain and stabilize the retail price of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Response of Carolina, Inc. v. Leasco Response, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Research Corp. v. Pfister Associated Growers, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1969
- Walder v. Paramount Publix CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Anixter v. Home-Stake Production Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1977
- In Re Investors Funding Corp. of Ny SEC. Lit.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Lopez v. Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- In re GEO Specialty Chemicals Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
- Coon v. FroehlichDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.