Legal Opinion

Pelzer v. Dale Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided June 26, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

SHIPMAN, Circuit Judge.

This bill in equity was brought to restrain the infringement of reissued letters patent No. 11,544, dated May 26, 1896, issued to Luther Stieringer, assignor to George Maitland, in lieu of original patent No. 294,697, dated March 4, 1884, for a combined gas and electric light fixture. Another original patent had been issued to Stieringer, dated June 6,1882, for an improvement in electrical fixtures, and had been reissued as No. 11,478, dated March 12, 1895. These two original patents were declared invalid by the circuit court for the Eastern district of Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maitland v. B. Goetz Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. Maitland v. GibsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
  3. Maitland v. Archer & Pancoast Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
  4. Maitland v. GibsonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pelzer v. Dale Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API