Maitland v. Gibson
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. This was a bill in equity by George Maitland against Alfred C. Gibson for infringement of certain patents for electric light fixtures.
1Opinion of the Court
ACHESON, Circuit Judge.
After a thorough examination of this record, we fail to discover any ground for disturbing the decree dismissing the bill of complaint. We all concur in the conclusions of the circuit court, and in the reasons therefor expressed in its opinion. That opinion is so full and satisfactory that any further discussion of the case is needless. We therefore adopt the opinion of the court below as our own, and upon it we affirm the decree. Decree affirmed.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Lowell v. TriplettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
- Horn & Brannen Mfg. Co. v. PelzerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
- Maitland v. Archer & Pancoast Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
- Paul Boynton Co. v. Morris Chute Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
- Pelzer v. Dale Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.