Legal Opinion

Maitland v. Gibson

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania

Decided June 19, 1894PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was a bill in equity by George Maitland against Alfred 0. Gibson for infringement of certain patents for electric-light fixtures. On final hearing.

1Opinion of the Court

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

This bill charges the defendant with infringement of two patents granted to Luther Stieringer,-—-No. 259,235, dated June 6, 1882, for “electrical fixture,” and No. 294,697, dated March 4,1884, for “combined gas and electric light fixture.”

*127Of Xo. 259,235. the claims involved are as follows:

“(1) A fixture lor electric lights, supported from the piping of a house, and electrically insulated therefrom, substantially as set forth.” “(7) In an electric-light fixture supported from the piping, the combination of an open and insulating joint connecting the fixture and pipe…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Horn & Brannen Mfg. Co. v. PelzerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1898
  2. Maitland v. Archer & Pancoast Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1896
  3. Pelzer v. Dale Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API