Legal Opinion
Scott Michael Brasier v. Peter A. Douglas Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 27, 1987No. 86-2050PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Per curiam
After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R. App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.8(c) and 27.-1.2. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
-Petitioner appeals from the district court opinion and order dismissing the petition he had filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We affirm.
There is a preliminary issue of whether Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 97 S.Ct. 2497, 53 L.Ed.2d 594 (1977), precluded federal habeas…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kevin Winston Osborn v. Duane Shillinger, Warden of the Wyoming State Penitentiary A.G. McClintock the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Feldon Jackson, Jr. v. John ShanksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Tillman v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.