Legal Opinion

Hall v. Bannock County

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1959No. 8645PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNUDSON, Justice.

The material allegations of appellants’ complaint are that the appellants are the surviving husband and all of the heirs-at-law of Ruth T. Hall, deceased. That Bannock County is the owner and operator of the Bannock Memorial Hospital and the other respondents are employees of the hospital. That decedent Ruth T. Hall entered the hospital on July 9, 1956 and on July 10, 1956 underwent major surgery at the hands of Dr. O. F. Call. That following the surgery said decedent remained in the recovery room for a short time following which she was, by the respondents Parisot and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baldwin v. EwingIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Pilmer v. Boise Traction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Stearns Ex Rel. Stearns v. GravesIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Say v. HodginIdaho Supreme Court · 1911
  5. State v. CoferIdaho Supreme Court · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Smith v. Big Lost River Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Flowerdew v. WarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Borowski v. Von SolbrigAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Kuhn v. DellIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Hall v. BaconIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API