Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the Court
To the Honorable House of Representatives:
The following response is respectfully returned:
Senate Bill (SB) 436 proposes to amend RSA 654:1 (Supp. 2007) by adding a new section, RSA 654:1, III, which would provide: “A person who is 17 years of age, who otherwise meets the eligibility requirements of paragraph I, may vote at a state primary election or a presidential primary election preceding a general election at which the person will be 18 years of age.” SB 436 also proposes to amend RSA 654:7 (Supp. 2007) to add the following emphasized language to the voter registration form prescribed by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- League of United Latin American Citizens v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- New Hampshire Municipal Trust Workers' Compensation Fund v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- New Hampshire Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- City of Concord v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
- Town of Canaan v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
- NEW HAMPSHIRE ASS'N OF COUNTIES v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.