Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 19, 2008No. 2008-292PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

To the Honorable House of Representatives:

The following response is respectfully returned:

Senate Bill (SB) 436 proposes to amend RSA 654:1 (Supp. 2007) by adding a new section, RSA 654:1, III, which would provide: “A person who is 17 years of age, who otherwise meets the eligibility requirements of paragraph I, may vote at a state primary election or a presidential primary election preceding a general election at which the person will be 18 years of age.” SB 436 also proposes to amend RSA 654:7 (Supp. 2007) to add the following emphasized language to the voter registration form prescribed by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. League of United Latin American Citizens v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Baines v. New Hampshire Senate PresidentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  4. New Hampshire Municipal Trust Workers' Compensation Fund v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. New Hampshire Ass'n v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  2. City of Concord v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
  3. Town of Canaan v. Secretary of StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  4. NEW HAMPSHIRE ASS'N OF COUNTIES v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API