Legal Opinion
City of Concord v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 31, 2012No. 2011-462PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.
The petitioners, the City of Concord, the County of Belknap, and Mascenic Regional School District, appeal an order of the Superior Court (McNamara, J.) denying their motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of the respondent, the State of New Hampshire. We affirm.
I
The pertinent facts are not in dispute. The New Hampshire Retirement System (NHRS) is a tax qualified pension trust for certain public employees. RSA 100-A:2 (2001). Under RSA chapter 100-A, police officers, teachers, and firefighters are required to be enrolled in NHRS. See RSA 100-A:3, 1(a) (Supp. 2010)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Izazaga v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- City of New Orleans v. ASSESSORS'RETIREMENT AND RELIEF FUNDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Swiezynski v. CivielloSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- New Hampshire Municipal Trust Workers' Compensation Fund v. FlynnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1990
- John A. Cookson Co. v. New Hampshire Ball Bearings, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re CarrierSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- David P. Eby & a. v. State of New HampshireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- In re Theresa Houlahan TrustSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Professional Fire Fighters of New Hampshire & a. v. State of New Hampshire & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
- Caroline Casey & a. v. New Hampshire Secretary of State & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.