Legal Opinion

Houghton & Robinson v. Puryear

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 3, 1895No. 583PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chief Justice.

Appellee sued Houghton & Robinson and the sheriff of Mason County to recover damages for a wrongful levy of an execution upon a lot of goods, wares, etc., which appellee claimed were in his possession and used by him in carrying on a liquor business. The execution was against J. F. Ottens, and plaintiff alleged, that J. F. Ottens was a partner with him in the business, which was being conducted under the firm name of James M. Puryear; that he and J. F. Ottens were to share the profits and losses in equal parts; that by the agreement the business was to be' conducted in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Frank v. TatumTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Epperson v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Walsh v. AdamsNew York Supreme Court · 1846
  4. Smith v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Ford v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jung Fu Chien v. ChenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Amarillo Nat. Bank v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Martin v. HemphillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  4. Amarillo Commercial Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Purcel v. WellsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API