People v. Deegan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Foote, C.
The defendant was convicted by a jury, of the crime of larceny,—the theft of a calf. From the judgment rendered in the premises, and an order denying him a new trial, he appeals.
The evidence upon which he was tried is mainly circumstantial, but we see no reason to declare, as the defendant contends we should, that the jury were not warranted in returning the verdict of guilty.
In the progress of the trial, a witness for the prosecution, Mr. Zeilor, testified that he saw the' defendant and those claimed to have been with him, on the night of the alleged stealing, at Selma, in Fresno…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Ipswitch v. FernandezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. BurgenerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. CrookerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. LearyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.