Legal Opinion

Ipswitch v. Fernandez

California Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1890No. 12242PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from the judgment in favor of defendant, and from an order denying a new trial.

It is unnecessary to determine the motions made to dismiss the appeal, and to strike out a portion of the transcript, which are urged by the respondent, as will appear from the conclusion reached herein.

The evidence on the issues of fact involved was fairly conflicting, and we cannot disturb the verdict of the jury on the ground that it was against the evidence.

The most serious ground for a new trial taken by appellant is misconduct of the jury, based on the allegation that one of the jurors was…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wood v. MoultonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. People v. DeeganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Riley v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  5. Caraveo v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API