Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Dailey v. Dailey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1931No. 23021. Department TwoPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

From the opinion of this court in the case of A. E. Dailey, Respondent, v. F. O. Dailey, Appellant, 148 Wash. 668, 269 Pac. 1118, it appears that December 4,1926, a decree was entered by the superior court for Snohomish county, denying Mr. A. E. Dailey’s application for a divorce, dismissing his complaint with prejudice, and granting to Mrs. F. O. Dailey, for her support and maintenance, the sum of fifty dollars per month. This court, in the case cited, affirmed an order of the superior court denying Mrs. Dailey’s application for an allowance by way of attorney’s fees incurred in resisting an…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Dailey v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Dailey v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Dailey v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Tetro v. TetroWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Mead School District No. 354 v. Mead Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Keller v. KellerWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API