Dailey v. Dailey

The appellant brought this action for a divorce on two grounds. He had previously brought an action for the same relief upon other grounds. In that action, a divorce was denied on December 4, 1926, but the wife, upon her cross-complaint, was allowed separate maintenance in money to be paid periodically. Twice after the entry of that decree the appellant sought to have it vacated, but without success. Some history of the litigation between these parties may be found in the following cases in this court: Dailey v. Dailey, 148 Wash. 668, 269 Pac. 1118; State ex rel. Dailey v. Superior Court, 150…