State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pacific county, Geo. Dysart, Esq., judge pro tempore, entered February 18, 1911, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, awarding damages for a civil contempt, after a trial before the court without a jury.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This is a contempt proceeding, instituted by the relator against the defendants, charging them with wilfully violating an order and decree of the superior court in the case of Nicomen Boom Company v. North Shore Boom & Driving Company. The relator sought to have defendants fined and imprisoned, and also to recover damages sustained *318since November 22, 1907, np to April £4, 1910. This proceeding grows out of the same case as the one reported in 55 Wash. 1, 103 Pac. 426, viz., State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co. The-parties and the judgment are the same, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex inf. Crow v. ShepherdSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- People ex rel. Attorney General v. ToolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
- State ex rel. Nicomen Boom Co. v. North Shore Boom & Driving Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909
- Lorick & Lowrance v. MotleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- West v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by12 opinions
- Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
- Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Department of Game v. Puyallup Tribe, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1972
- Foreman v. ForemanUtah Supreme Court · 1946
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.