Legal Opinion

Erickson v. Schenkers International Forwarders, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1994No. 930488PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Defendant Schenkers International Forwarders, Inc. (“Schenkers”), appeals from an order of the Fourth Judicial District Court denying its motion to set aside a default judgment entered in favor of plaintiffs Louis A. Erickson and Direct To Dealer Sales, Inc. (“Erickson”). Although the district court determined that Schenkers’ motion to set aside default was timely filed and that its failure to respond to the complaint was due to excusable neglect, it ruled that Schenkers had failed to demonstrate a meritorious defense as required by State ex rel. Department of Social Services…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Downey State Bank v. Major-Blakeney CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Utah State Department of Social Services v. MusselmanUtah Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. MohiUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Lund v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Judson v. Wheeler RV Las Vegas, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Covey v. CoveyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API