Legal Opinion
Keith v. Day
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided February 1, 1983No. 8210SC21PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BECTON, Judge.
I
Defendant first argues that the entry of the preliminary injunction by the trial court without requiring plaintiff to post a bond pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1A-1 Rule 65(c) (1969) was fatal to the validity of that order. This is apparently a case of first impression for this Court as neither party nor our own research discloses any reported North Carolina decisions that address the precise issue of the Rule 65(c) security requirement. Generally, there are three areas of inquiry attendant to the grant of injunc-tive relief: whether there exists an adequate remedy at law,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lawrence Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Roth v. Bank of the CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reinders Brothers, Inc. v. Rain Bird Eastern Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- Leroy v. Great Western United Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical Association, William S. Apple Federal Prescription Service, Inc. v. American Pharmaceutical AssociationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hoots v. PryorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- Keith v. DayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Barr-Mullin, Inc. v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Iverson v. TM One, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Leonard E. Warner, Inc. v. Nissan Motor Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.