Legal Opinion

Goodman Toyota, Inc. v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 17, 1980No. 392 PCPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This matter is before us upon plaintiffs petition for writ of supersedeas, application for temporary stay and petition for discretionary review under G.S. 7A-31 of the decision of the Court of Appeals reported in 47 N. C. App 628, 267 S.E. 2d 714 (1980).

Plaintiffs petition for writ of supersedeas to reinstate the preliminary injunction by the trial court is allowed.

Plaintiffs petition for discretionary review is allowed for the limited purpose of entering this order in the cause: Our review of the record and the Court of Appeals’ opinion reveals that the Court of Appeals improvidently…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tridyn Industries, Inc. v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. Fayetteville Street Christian SchoolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Goodman Toyota, Inc. v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Keith v. DayCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Goodman Toyota, Inc. v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API