People v. Washington
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
For reasons that follow, we hold that the motion court erred in dismissing the indictment. The court acted on its conclusion that the indictment was premised on a legally insufficient chemist’s report. We disagree, and we reverse the order of dismissal. Our holding in this appeal serves as a basis for reversal in a number of other appeals decided herewith (see, People v Carrington, — AD2d —, 1997 NY Slip Op 00495 [decided herewith]; People v English, — AD2d —, 1997 NY Slip Op 00498 [decided herewith]; People v Gonzales, — AD2d —, 1997 NY Slip Op 00503 [decided herewith];…
3Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. SwampNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. JensenNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re Jahron S.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
- In re Detrece H.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. GalatroNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Cadilla v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- People v. CerdaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. GonzalesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.