Legal Opinion

Ensoniq Corp. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 1998No. H016861PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COTTLE, P. J.—

I. Introduction

This matter arises from the competing claims of petitioner Ensoniq Corporation (hereafter, Ensoniq) and its former employee, real party in interest Jon Dattoro (hereafter, Dattoro) to intellectual property which Dattoro brought to California when he left his employment with Ensoniq. Ensoniq contacted the district attorney, who obtained a search warrant and seized the disputed property from Dattoro’s residence. However, the district attorney decided not to prosecute Dattoro, who then brought a motion for return of the seized property.

Ensoniq now seeks a writ…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. EubanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Gershenhorn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Buker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Lueter v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. In Re Seizure of Approximately 28 Grams of MarijuanaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2003
  4. Lawrence v. Superior Court of San Mateo Cnty., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. Lawrence v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API