Legal Opinion

Matthews v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 30, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice:

This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction for possession of a Molotov cocktail in violation of 11 Del.C. § 360. 1 The determinative question is whether there was reversible error in the Trial Court’s refusal to put the following questions to the prospective jurors, prior to trial, on voir dire examination:

1) Do you have any antagonism against black persons ?

2) Would you be able to accept the word of a black young man over that of a white young man?

The defendant is a young black man and the principal prosecuting witness is a young white man. The Trial Court permitted no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aldridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. State v. HiggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  4. Robelen Piano Company v. Di FonzoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1961
  5. Parson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Maes v. District Court, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. State v. LampmanCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. FosterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Preston v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  5. United States ex rel. Preston v. EllingsworthDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API