Commonwealth v. Foster
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Packel, J.,
Justice should be impartial but that does not mean that in the course of its administration judges must be color-blind. Nevertheless, the president judge of the court below, in approving a denial of voir dire questioning on racial discrimination stated: “The law should be color-blind and the less we get into questions of race, the better off we all would be.” To sweep under the rug, figuratively, the reality of life that racial prejudice exists can prevent a defendant from obtaining a fair trial.
The black appellant had been tried by an all white jury. His attorney made a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aldridge v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Commonwealth v. McGrewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- State v. HiggsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Pinder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1891
- Bentivoglio v. RalstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Maes v. District Court, City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- Commonwealth v. MayoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Lenkiewicz v. LangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. DavisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. HollandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.