Legal Opinion

State v. Martineau

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 2022No. A174133PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

590 Submitted December 30, 2021, affirmed February 16, 2022 STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. DALE WILLIAM MARTINEAU, Defendant-Appellant. Washington County Circuit Court 16CR60377; A174133

505 P3d 1094

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction—based on unanimous jury verdicts—for several offenses. Before trial, defendant proffered a jury instruc- tion that “all twelve jurors must agree on a verdict of guilty to return a guilty verdict,” and “ten or more jurors must agree on a verdict of not guilty to return a not guilty verdict.” The trial court rejected that instruction, concluding…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
  2. Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. Flores RamosOregon Supreme Court · 2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. DippreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  2. State v. Juarez-HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. State v. De MauroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. MintonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. State v. SimsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API