Legal Opinion

Reil v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1992No. 92-027PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Weber

Kenneth Reil, claimant, appeals from a judgment by the Workers’ Compensation Court ordering him to reimburse the insurer for all benefits and attorney fees. The State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund (State Fund) filed a cross-appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Court order denying its motion to join an additional party defendant. We affirm.

The parties raise the following issues for our review:

1. Is the State Fund entitled to restitution of all compensation and medical benefits paid pursuant to a judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court which was subsequently reversed on appeal?

2. Is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johner v. Wyoming State Treasurer Ex Rel. Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Williams v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Reil v. Billings Processors, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Hanson v. HansenMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Rath v. St. Labre Indian SchoolMontana Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gallipo v. City of RutlandSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  2. Progressive Direct Insurance v. StuivengaMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bernoskie v. ZarinskyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007
  4. Crail Creek Associates, LLC v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Crail Creek Associates, LLC v. OlsonMontana Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API