Ridgely v. Pfingstag

Opposing contentions in this case relate to interpretation of (1) a decision of this court sixty-five years ago (Heald v. Heald, 56 Md. 300) construing the will of William Heald, who died in 1868, and (2) acts, omissions, statements and legal proceedings, on the part of heirs, or successors in interest to heirs, of the testator during these sixty-five years. These contentions have been ably presented in oral argument and. in full, but compact, well-indexed briefs and appendices and have been carefully considered. Our conclusions permit us to omit mention of many of the facts, and some of the…