Legal Opinion

Heald v. Heald

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 28, 1881PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. The hill was filed hy the appellant against the appellees, and a pro forma decree dismissing the hill and reserving to the complainant the right to appeal, was passed by consent of parties by the Court below, (Dobbin, J.) The complainant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The bill in this case is filed to obtain a construction of the will of William Heald.

The testator left three sons, William H, John H., and Howard Heald, all of whom were of full age at the time of his death.

He left also two infant children, Chárles M. and Alice H. Heald.

Before his death, two children, namely, Edward Heald and Adeline E. Spurrier had died, each leaving infant children, living at the time of the testator’s death.

He divided his estate into seven parts, three of which were devised absolutely to his three sons, William H, John H. and Howard Heald.

*305By the fourth item, the testator…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hawley v. JamesCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1836
  2. Goldsborough ex rel. Goldsborough v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Deford v. DefordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Anway v. Grand Rapids Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Maryland Committee for Fair Representation v. Tawes, Governor & Board of State CanvassersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Long v. LongCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1884
  4. Graham v. WhitridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1904
  5. Bunting v. SpeekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API