Legal Opinion

Maryland National Bank v. Cummins

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 18, 1991No. 36, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

In this class action the Circuit Court for Baltimore City held that investment practices for personal trusts followed by a corporate trustee for nearly ten years violated the prudent investor rule. We consider multiple issues relating to liability and to the relief granted.

The corporate trustee is the appellant, Maryland National Bank (MNB). Appellees, the plaintiffs below (Plaintiffs), are income beneficiaries of a testamentary trust administered by MNB which was funded in September 1972. Plaintiffs sued on April 6, 1983. The circuit court certified Plaintiffs as…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Ellsworth v. Sherne Lingerie, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  3. Hayward v. PlantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Board of Trustees of the Employees' Retirement System v. Mayor of Baltimore CityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Manchester Band of Pomo Indians, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Buxton v. BuxtonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Kann v. KannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Harford County v. Saks Fifth Avenue Distribution Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. United Cable Television of Baltimore Ltd. Partnership v. BurchCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API