Legal Opinion

Ranus v. Blum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and respondents’ motion granted. Memorandum: Respondents appeal from an order of Special Term which denied their motion and granted petitioner’s cross motion for summary judgment, ordering respondents to proceed with a destigmatization hearing concerning the reasons for the termination of petitioner’s employment.

Special Term erred in concluding that a prior decision of this court (Ranus v Blum, 96 AD2d 1144) was "res judicata” and determined the matter which is the subject of this appeal. There, insofar as is pertinent to this appeal, we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Lentlie v. EganNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Petix v. ConnelieNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Ranus v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Browne v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API