Legal Opinion
Lentlie v. Egan
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 28, 1984PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
The affirmed finding of fact that respondents acted in good faith in terminating petitioner’s probationary employment on the basis of unsatisfactory performance is beyond our review. (Morgan Servs. v Lavan Corp., 59 NY2d 796.)
With regard to petitioner’s claim for a name-clearing hearing, “[o]nly if the [public] employer creates and disseminates a false and defamatory impression about the employee in connection with his termination is such a hearing required.” (Codd v Velger, 429 US 624, 628…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Codd v. VelgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ostrowe v. LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Matter of Thomas v. New York Temp. State Comm'n on Regulation of LobbyingNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- MATTER OF SWINTON v. SafirNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Miller v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Bezar v. New York State Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Burka v. New York City Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- MATTER OF BERGAMINI v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating Auth.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.